War Then and Now

With intense interest over this week's release of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) report, National Review Online commentators weigh in, and Victor Davis Hanson compares our nation's response to today's world threat to the response to the attack on Pearl Harbor 65 years ago today.

The limitations on our war-making are just as often self-imposed. Yes, we defeated the Axis powers in less than four years, but it was at a ghastly cost. To defeat both Japan and Germany, we averaged over 8,000 Americans lost every month of the war - compared to around 50 per month since Sept. 11.

So far the United States has encouraged its citizens to shop rather than sacrifice. The subtext is that we can defeat the terrorists and their autocratic sponsors with just a fraction of our available manpower - ensuring no real disruption in our lifestyles. That certainly wasn't the case with the Depression-era generation who fought World War II.

While I've only had time to read the ISG Executive Summary, I tend to think it is a mix of constructive and dubious recommendations and should be considered in combination with other sources, particularly our military, in reworking our strategy for Iraq in the context of the global situation.